[Home]  [Company]  [Industry Support]  [Products and Services]  [Contact us]  [GCAT Conference]

Highlights: [Dallas, TX]  [Houma, LA]  [Polk, FL]  [Volusia, FL]  [Automatic Voice Notification]  [Skip-Tracing]

Perspectives: [Elected Official]  [Judicial]  [IT]  [Collections Manager]  [Collector]

 

Judicial

Judges are often frustrated by technology that cannot or will not support their discretion.  The failure to recognize this reality will inevitably jeopardize most collection and compliance efforts.  Cities and counties attempt to broker judicial consensus across multiple courts to define minimum requirements that will satisfy all.  While noble, this approach is flawed and often fails.

Judicial consensus should not be required to implement and efficient and effective collections and compliance solution.  A successful solution must satisfy the requirements of each individual and unique court.  Progressive courts immediately recognize our philosophy and appreciate the value we offer.  Each District, County, Justice of the Peace, Appellant and Municipal court can define their own unique processes: payment plan terms and conditions, community service plan terms and conditions, dunning letter and card format/content, timing between significant events, cashiering, Show Cause rocket docket behavior, etc.

"Friends of the court..."

_______________________________________________________________________

Ši-Plow.com 1984-2010.  All rights reserved. 
Call us @ 210.524.7779
(United States). Or e-mail for info.